Wednesday 15 October 2014

First hand knowledge of CRA tactics from someone who’s been there…

 

As we’ve stated on numerous occasions this blog was put together to document the wrongdoings and cover ups by the government of Canada. It documents just a little of what is going on at the Canada Revenue Agency’s (CRA) Montreal Tax Service Office (TSO). The situation at the Montreal TSO was so bad that in June 2012 the CRA announced job cuts eliminating the Montreal Special Enforcement division responsible for many of the issues brought up here; this is the audit division which hid the fact that most audits were truly just criminal investigations.

Whether it be counselling their employees to commit perjury, human rights abuses, acts of harassment towards female employees of the Montreal Tax Service Office, sexual harassment of a terminated female employee of the Montreal TSO, even physical assault of another female employee of that same TSO… the CRA has no limits to what it is willing to do to win at all costs.

Today we share a document prepared by Clint Kimery, president of Gunner Corp (http://www.gunnercorp.ca/). The document, entitled “Predominant Purpose”, details how the CRA regularly crosses the line from "audit" to "investigation"; it exposes the esoteric functions within the investigation sectors of the Canada Revenue Agency mandated to develop prosecutions, using special AIMS Audit Groups that covertly discriminate the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms.[1]

From the author[2]:

The primary intent of this document is to provide the impetus that advances the law in this area of criminal justice, an area where judicial determinations have traditionally been misguided and improperly rendered from limited fact and opinion alone, which has notably resulted in a zigzag of assumptive judgments easily overturned, often to the detriment of the accused, by a Crown appealing to a higher court.

The secondary objective of this document is to provide legal defence teams, litigating tax prosecutions, with a guide of concise explanations and directives with an exclusive disclosure listing that identifies pertinent disclosure evidence data necessary for full answer in defence with respect to the determination of “Predominant Purpose”.

Click on the link http://www.davidsherman.ca/files/opener.php?file=PREDOMINANT PURPOSE (Revised 2014.02.07).pdf

 


[1] Clint Kimery, Predominant Purpose (2014.02.07 Revision), 1.

[2] Clint Kimery, Predominant Purpose (2014.02.07 Revision), 1.